Of Androids and Electric Sheep

One of the covers of the graphic novel series, drawn by Tony Parker, published between 2009-2011

I’ve watched the original Bladerunner1 (many times) and the new one2 (once), but I hadn’t read the original novel3 (“Do androids dream of electric sheep?”) ever, despite repeatedly resolving to, and buying it, renting it, whatever.

I still haven’t (hah), but thanks to Comixology, I’ve done something similar, which is reading the amazing graphic novel of the same name, published in a 24-part series about a decade ago4.

There were a few … dated bits5, but c’mon, it was written over half a century ago6 now.

Something I wasn’t prepared for: it is much more than the movie, and way*, way wierder than the movie. The movie is very normal compared to the story in the book, and I can see why … there’s enough going in with the dystopian future and he grim task of retiring Androids, to then bring in Mercerism into the mix (which seems like a minor side-detail towards the beginning, but gradually seeps into the whole environment — and the graphic novel really shines in this part — contributing more to the man vs. machine question than anything in the movie.

It gave me the same feeling as the movie in parts, and I’ll admit I read some of it while listening to the soundtrack7 🙂

It’s very easy to recommend, well worth the time 8. You might expect it to be “mostly the same as the movie”, which I did too, but it truly is a whole different experience.

  1. A year before I was born ↩︎
  2. ”2049” ↩︎
  3. Fun link: here’s a list of all the various cover pictures the original book’s been published with, in different languages ↩︎
  4. available separately, or as a single Omnibus version ↩︎
  5. using physical coins to make calls, the presence of the Soviets, and … flying cars ↩︎
  6. 1968 !! ↩︎
  7. read an article about it, listen on Spotify ↩︎
  8. $9.99 on Comixology, or free with the subscription ↩︎

The problem with Kindle

I got my first Kindle a decade ago. I got my second and third Kindle in the years since, but while the divide is amazing (and imho, I wouldn’t even want more out of it at this point), it’s the library that is bumming me out.

When it comes to my physical books, I have a similar problem of over-accumulation. And yet, every year or so, I can go through it and clear out roughly an entire shelf, donate it, and have the satisfaction of looking at a diminished collection, perhaps a collection where I know where things are.

There is absolutely no way to do the same with my digital collection. I visited my Kindle library today and found a list of undifferentiated 290 titles in there.

Yes, there are collections.

Yes, I can go through the list and tag it with one or more collections.

That’s not good enough. I want to be able to see fewer items when I want. I wish I could get rid of old ebooks, just so I don’t feel burdened by looking at this list.

Books give-away, featuring Airtable

Roughly every three years, I find I’ve amassed too many books, and have to give some (around 50-75) away.

There was a great “used books store” in downtown Mountain View, which (tragically1) had to close up shop and move away, and the time after that, I went to the local Goodwill, and this time I’m thinking of donating what I can to the local library, we’ll see.

It’s somewhat disappointing that there isn’t any record of the hundreds of books I’ve given away over the last decade and change … so this time I thought I’d make a list.

Now the idea of making a list of the books I have, has come up in the past, but it has either

  • been on paper
  • or otherwise not accessible any more
  • or not re-attempted because there’s just no easy way to do it.

Until now.

I have this love-hate relationship with Airtable, it seems — I’ve written before about how their pricing is geared towards enterprises and lacking a good “personal use plan”, but … the fact is, for something like this, it’s dead simple to use.

What I recorded here is the name of each book, an image of the cover, and whether it’s hardcover/softcover2, and … I was going through them at the rate of about fifteen seconds per book.

Here3 is the result: an accessible list of everything I’m about to give away this time.

P.S. I realized something else: in case you live nearby and want to pick up anything on this list, leave a note on the list (it’s read-only, but comment-able), and I’ll figure out a way to hand them over.

  1. https://www.sfgate.com/books/article/BookBuyers-closes-its-doors-in-Mountain-View-7288142.php
  2. Not sure why I did this, it’s something I thought would matter …
  3. https://airtable.com/invite/l?inviteId=invfJzu4jolUgZd7t&inviteToken=ffd7628ff3a544f4f40ecd56c4406bdefbf232cfca5b0a274b3a62890945e512

Rorschach tests

Sometimes I have flashback memories of certain small well-defined thing-experiences, this is one of them.

It’s about a book, this book, and the timeframe here is … about 12 years ago (!), a year after the book came came out.

I remember the moment I found this in the library (at the times, the Forest Hills branch of the Queens library system), and felt like I should pick it up.

And then I remember the moment when I felt, “damn, this is the book I would have wished to write one day!”

It’s hard to describe, so I’ve linked to ways to get context at the end (some excerpts from reviews here below) — but reading it was one of the most surreal yet pleasant experiences I’ve had … and I’ve had a few of those.

…readers will have observed that Hall is not going for the Dirty Realist of the Year award. His shout-outs instead go to Paul Auster, Haruki Marukami, the “Matrix” movies, “Memento” and, peering back into the distant mists of time, “Jaws.”

The text itself tells a story. Inkblots, puzzles, pictures made from vowels and consonants strewn just so. The climax comes to life in an unnerving 50-page flipbook of a shark racing right at you. The typography is so complex, in fact, the print run was sent to a company in Italy, the only place with a press nimble enough to do the job. “The Raw Shark Texts” is a kind of Rorschach test. Is it a thriller, a love story? A philosophical quest? Yes.

Now … I went back to Amazon to check, and it turns out this is the only book he ever wrote, which …



The last Neal Stephenson book I read was probably Anathem, which was a while ago (I remember I was enamored enough to have subsequently bought the “accompanying soundtrack1”).

Before that had been the massive and delightful “System of the world” trilogy (as it turned out, I read all of these on the Kindle device I then possessed, and only realized how fat these books were in physical form when I saw them in a store).

Seveneves begins with a bang2 (and yes, Neal does seem to be good at beginnings, better at middles, and not-so-great at endings, and … what’s wrong with that? 🙂

I came for the exquisite world-building and was not disappointed at all. This was an extremely detail-oriented expository sort-of book, that would turn off anyone who wasn’t ok with that style.

So … having completed this book a week ago, I’m a satisfied reader here, especially since I’ve been waiting (for many years now) to do a better job of slowly reading some fiction. It’s hard because time is short, but it’s still satisfying, so it’s worth being creative about fitting in a few minutes of reading here and there 3.

The story is largely in three parts: what happens soon after the moon breaks up, what happens after the “hard rain” wipes out all life on earth, and a “fast-forward” to a speculative future five millennia after all this.

In all this nitty-gritty detail, it’s easy to think that this is all about imagining the future with a clear slate, while … I couldn’t shake the feeling that this could just as well be about the past.

There is a strong tendency to think of history4 as essentially linear, and even, to some extent, “progressive”; that there is some end-goal5 towards which we are, and have been, progressing, slowly or quickly.

What Seveneves can be seen as, then, is an imagined “theory of cataclysm”: while the majority of the text is centered around “how do humans survive in space?”, the other question, reading between the lines, is “how do future generations of human beings, born on earth with none of the contextual cultural and scientific memory of the earlier survivors-in-space, make sense of these gods-and-demons, and their mysterious devices?”

Or, to put it bluntly, what if these “future generations of primitive savages”, who don’t understand the works of the “magic-wielding” space-humans, and have to come up with their own myths to explain them6, are basically … us?

  1. “Iolet: music from the world of anathem” ↩︎
  2. The first line reads: ‌The moon blew up without warning and for no apparent reason. ↩︎
  3. Practically, this means resorting to the e-book format most of the time … ↩︎
  4. (in all its forms: cultural, political, biological, geological) ↩︎
  5. this of course, is what most disagreements are about … ↩︎
  6. (especially after these space-humans (perhaps) fight against and destroy each other) ↩︎

Back to Neal Stephenson ….

I think the first Neal Stephenson book I read was Snow Crash, though it was some sort of partial online copy and I didn’t finish it all the way through. This was sometime in the late 90s. I liked it, didn’t fully get it, and I forgot it.

Then I read Anathem, and it blew me away, and I still think it’s my favorite. Not so much for what happens in the story itself (in fact, I’m forgetting the ending as I write this (and I’m not sure he does a good job of endings in general, hmm …)), but more about the world in it, all the wonderful details, and how they’re revealed.

Then I read Snow Crash again, and I loved it this time, and … this “linguistic superpower meta-meme” went into my mind and embedded itself there, one of possibly only three or four others like it (the meta-meme of psychohistory being another old, deep idea, but more on that some other time).

Then I read the Baroque trilogy, and was thrilled to bits. This was on my Kindle (new at the time to me, I’m talking about a decade ago from today), and created a side-passion of etymology for me (I’d been lost in the endless link-following of Wikipedia earlier, this was the same but for word-origins …). (Also, I don’t think I would’ve been able to read them in their paper forms, which I realized when I saw a copy of The System of the World (my favorite of the three, I think) in a bookshop and realized there was no way I was going to lug that around with me.)

Anyway, I was aware of him continuing to write but hadn’t really read any fiction in many years, and while a colleague had recommended Seveneves to me last year, it had languished on my wish-list … until this week, when I started reading it again (in e-book form, if you must know).

Not much of a spoiler alert to share the very first line of the book: The moon blew up without warning and for no apparent reason. So yes, a compelling reason to keep reading. And about 7% of the way through, I’m enjoying it (small observation though: this definitely belongs in the pre-2016-age-of-innocence era when it comes to describing human beings).

When I’m done I think I’ll revisit everything else he’s been up to lately (D.o.d.o and Reamde), which means I have several months of reading pipeline filled up …

Using “x-ray” in the Kindle

(Note: this piece had been lying around from about three years ago! I had just never posted it!)

I recently discovered the “x-ray” feature in the Kindle, partly because I only recently resumed reading something on it (“Moby Dick”, two-thirds of the way in).

I can imagine it being super-helpful when going through a really big book with lots of characters etc., but clearly, it has its share of amusing entries. See the one below for “Jove”.


I read books very rarely these days, or rather very slowly, sometimes just a page or two a day. One of the ways I do “read” regularly is orally rather than visually, by listening to 10-15 minutes daily. Audible.com’s $14.95 monthly membership happens to work out quite well for this, since I rarely finish listening to a book in less than a month. Yes, ten years ago this would’ve been a joke, but it’s totally worth it.1

Selecting audiobooks is very different from regular books or e-books. It’s impossible to “hoard” them2(!) A bigger difference is what I end up looking for. Instead of going by the author or the theme, I find myself giving a huge weight to the narrator. An average narrator ruins the experience3.

The reason I mention this is I found a two-year old article4 about the same, which has a list of “famous” narrators. One of my famous narrators didn’t make the list, so I’ll mention her here. Wanda McCaddon5 was the narrator of “The Birth of the Modern” by Paul Johnson, and ever since, I’ve been seeking her out everywhere (my favorite so far has been “The Guns of August”).

Anyway, depending on your point of view, available time and inclination to listening to someone talk, you’ll either find the idea of audiobooks a “fad” or something you’d enjoy6. If it’s the latter, go for the 30-day free trial and see how you like it.

  1. Think “price of a haircut”, or “four cups of coffee at Starbucks” 
  2. Well, ok, you can, but you have to try hard. Compare to e-books, where a whole mass of them piles up in a jiffy. Which is why I gave up on them. 
  3. I wish most authors who try to read their own stuff would take a hint (one notable exception being Prof. Michael Drout
  4. Wall Street Journal, “The New Explosion in Audio Books 
  5. Though she uses a stage name, and I encountered her as “Nadia May” 
  6. On the other hand, some of the add-ons, like the so-called “immersive reading” experience where you buy both the audiobook and the e-book are definitely not worth it.